Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
ASTR 5460, Mon. Nov. 8, 2004
  • The Formation of Galaxies and Large Scale Structures in the Universe
  • Combes et al. chapter 12, also Longair (chapter 11-15)


  • Other: exams due – any discussion?
    • Observing Project reports not graded yet
    • Discuss Proposal Project (another handout)
    • Mini-TAC exercise for next week (handed out Wed.)
2
“Accelerating” into Cosmology
3
Issues of density contrast and growth of structure under gravitational instabilities
4
Recall: Spiral Galaxies -- Stability
  • Jean’s criteria governs “small scale” collapse due to self-gravitation
    • Treated as stability vs. perturbation in an infinite homogeneous medium in equilibrium
    • For fluid with a pressure P = ρ0vs2, then perturbations with λ > vs(G ρ0)-1/2 = λJ are unstable.
    • Basically, does the disturbance have time to cross in a freefall time, tff = (Gρ)-1/2?  If so, then pressure forces are negligible.
    • The sound crossing time is r/vs, which gives the λJ criteria
    • For galaxies, we can write an effective pressure in terms of the velocity dispersion: λ > σ(G ρ0)-1/2 = λJ
5
Jeans Mass and the
Growth of Perturbations
6
Jeans Mass and the
Growth of Perturbations
7
Longair’s take: Jean’s Instability
8
Longair’s take: Jean’s Instability
9
Jean’s Instability
10
Jeans Mass and the
Growth of Perturbations
11
Jeans Mass and the
Growth of Perturbations
12
Jeans Mass and the
Growth of Perturbations
13
Jeans Mass and the
Growth of Perturbations
14
Jean’s Instability in an Expanding Medium
15
Jeans Mass and the
Growth of Perturbations
16
Jean’s Instability in an Expanding Medium
17
Other issues
18
Other issues
19
Including Radiation
  • “Sea” of photons.  Photon Energy Density is proportional to 1/R4.  Note that the text has this WRONG.  Photon number density changes as 1/R3, but wavelengths stretch out.  Anyway, proceeding…
  • Recall the linearized perturbation equation



  • Set y = ρx/ργ = R/R(teq) where there is an equilibrium time where the two densities are equal.
20
Including Radiation
  • At this equilibrium time
21
What goes wrong with baryon-only cosmologies?
22
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation
23
Hot Dark Matter
24
Cold Dark Matter
25
Structure Simulations
26
More Simulations
  • From Combes et al., of CDM structure simulations.
  • They kind of work.
27
Growth of Adiabatic Fluctuations
  • Homogeneity scale is D>100 Mpc.  What of smaller perturbations?
  • Initial origin unknown.  A power spectrum is postulated (as gravity does not have a characteristic scale):
  • δρ/ρ = δM/M = AM –α
  • Significant perturbations on small scales would mean an excess of primordial black holes, and we don’t see much on the largest scales, which means alpha isn’t too large.
  • Adjust the amplitude A to match observation.
28
Growth of Adiabatic Fluctuations
  • Do perturbations affect entropy per baryon?  If not, then they are adiabatic:
  • δs/s = 3δT/T – δns/ns = 0
  • δT/T=1/3 δρ/ρ
  • Whereas for isothermal:
  • T = constant
  • δs/s = δns/ns and no T fluctuations, and the photon to baryon ratio must vary
  • Jeans mass is limit of growth vs. acoustic action
  • When universe was radiation dominated sound speed was order of light speed (divided by root 3).


29
Growth of Adiabatic Fluctuations
  • LJ ~ ctexp ~ Lhorizon
  • This increases with the expansion, until recombination.  At this time…
  • Universe becomes matter dominated with density going as 1/R3 and 1/Tγ3.  Sound speed goes as 1/R, and so Jeans’ mass goes as R-3/2.


30
Growth of Adiabatic Fluctuations
31
Fluctuation Spectrum at Recombination
  • Contrasting possible isothermal and adiabatic scenarios.  See Rees (1984) for more details.
32
Spectrum of Initial Fluctuations
33
Evolution of a pertubation
34
Nonlinear Evolution
  • Pancake model: HDM or adiabatic baryons you get a characteristic collapse scale.  “Azita’s House of Pancakes.”  Galaxies form from pancake fragmentation.
  • Heirarchical scenarios.  Isothermal fluctuations or CDM gives no cutoff at small scales.  Some details in the text for particular cosmologies (which we will wait on).
  • Numerical simulations pay a serious role here.
  • More details in text, but we’re rush, rush, rush at this point.  Feel the knowledge flooding your brain, but don’t drown!
35
What this might look like
  • Movie simulation of galaxy formation via assembly of small pieces (courtesy of Space Telescope Science Institute):
36
The Hubble Deep Field
37
Evidence for “Hierarchical” Galaxy Formation from the HDF
38
Structure Simulations
39
Galaxies and the Exgal background
  • DIRECTLY related to models by the fact of galaxy formation and evolution.  Everything must be self-consistent or the model must be discarded.
40
Peculiar Velocities
41
Quest for Primordial Galaxies:
Photometric/SED fitting
42
Photometric Vs. Spec. redshifts
43
Color-Color Diagram
44
UV Luminosity Density vs. z
  • Cf. Boyle and Terlevich 1998 that compared quasars and stars.
  • After Madau et al. 1996 (called the “Madau plot” even)
  • Must reconcile with galaxy formation + evolution scenarios.  Right?
  • Highest redshifts unclear, but some rise and then steep fall off.  Epoch of galaxy formation still unclear.


45
Coming up
  • We’ve talked around the crux of things: cosmology.  How does spacetime itself evolve?  How is redshifted related to distance, look-back time, etc.?
  • Will look at some specific formulations of distances and more (Hogg et al. pedagogical stuff) and classical formations, plus latest WMAP results.