1
|
- This week: Finish
Fundamental Plane
- Spiral Structure
- Follow-up WIRO Observing trip
- Spiral Structure
- (Ch. 5, Combes et al., parts)
- Unless noted, all figs and
eqs from Combes et al or Longair.
|
2
|
- Raw data to one accessible directory
- Copies of logs to everyone
- Everyone needs to do basic reductions:
- Bias subtraction
- Flat fielding
- Combination of images and cosmic ray rejection
- Flux calibration/image zero points
- “Basic” Analyses (on several ellipticals and spirals)
- Integrated magnitudes and colors, preferably with errors
- Surface Brightness Profiles and fits (e.g., r1/4 law)
- “Pretty” three color pictures (presentation is important)
- Additional Analyses (should try several of these)
- Quantitatively measuring “diskiness/boxiness” of
ellipticals (tricky)
- Ellipse position angle, ellipticity as function of radius
- Inclination angle of an intermediate spiral galaxy
- Colors of bulge vs. dust lane across bulge
- Colors of spiral arms/H II regions
- Anything else clever you can think of – be creative!
- Everyone should write up results as a paper using LaTeX with all the
five standard parts of a scientific article
|
3
|
- Luminosities, surface brightness, central velocity distribution, (and
others), are correlated, hence the term “fundamental
plane.” Ellipticals
populate a plane in parameter space. BIG area of research – very
useful tool and helps us understand galaxies.
- Faber & Jackson (1976) is a classic in this area (you might want to
look up and read this one):
- L ~ σx where x ≈4
- So, get dispersion from spectrum, get luminosity, and with magnitude get
distance!
|
4
|
- Dressler et al. (1987) include all three of the plane parameters and
find a tight relationship:
- Can also substitute in a new variable Dn (a diameter chosen to match a
surface brightness) which incorporates L and Σ.
- Can get distances then to various accuracies.
|
5
|
- Three views of the relationship from Inger Jorgensen et al. (1997). The top is “face-on”
and the other two views are projections.
- As the relationship involves Luminosity it is a distance indicator.
- Physical origin of interest for understanding early type galaxies.
|
6
|
- Physical origin:
- If Virial Theorem applies, then the FP means that M/L ratio depends on
the three variables.
- The orientation of the plane in parameter space implies that M/L depends
on the mass (M/L ~ L0.2)
- Metallicity also?
|
7
|
- Discuss basics only – too many topics to cover this semester.
- Will be covered in more detail in “Stars and the Milky Way”
next semester
|
8
|
- Already discussed many observational properties (e.g., frequency, types,
luminosity functions, rotation curves, light profiles, masses, etc.).
- Now want to spend some time discussing their most notable feature
– the spiral arms! It
hasn’t been such an easy thing to understand. Why not?
|
9
|
- Opening considerations:
- Disk Stability Issues. Most
of the mass of the galaxy is in a dark halo, and stars are treated as
particles in the overall potential, so should disks even be stable?
- Note that nearby interactions are unimportant: Trelax/tc
= (h/R)(N/(8logN)) – “collisionless” if large. For N = 1011, the
ratio of relaxation to crossing time is about 108.
|
10
|
- Small Scale Stability
- Must not satisfy the Jean’s criteria
- Large Scale Stability
|
11
|
- Jean’s criteria governs “small scale” collapse due to
self-gravitation
- Treated as stability vs. perturbation in an infinite homogeneous medium
in equilibrium
- For fluid with a pressure P = ρ0vs2,
then perturbations with λ > vs(G ρ0)-1/2
= λJ are unstable.
- Basically, does the disturbance have time to cross in a freefall time,
tff = (Gρ)-1/2? If so, then pressure
forces are negligible.
- The sound crossing time is r/vs, which gives the λJ
criteria
- For galaxies, we can write an effective pressure in terms of the
velocity dispersion: λ > σ(G ρ0)-1/2
= λJ
|
12
|
- Stability due to Rotation – large scales
- See Toomre (1964) for details
- Considered axisymmetric perterbations
- Consider small region of size L on a disk with surface density μ
(mass then is ~μL2), rotating at Ω, distance d
from the center. Imagine a
perturbation that locally increases the surface density.
- Angular momentum conserved, so the angular velocity must also increase,
creating a centrifugal force in the rotating frame. If this force can send the mass
back to its original position, system is stable.
- Stability: L > Lcrit
= 2Gμ/3Ω2, so requires large scales. Order of magnitude, Ω2R
= V2/R ~ GμR2/R2 = Gμ, so Lcrit
~ R
|
13
|
- Stability on all scales
- Combine the criteria for large and small scales
- Need a minimum velocity dispersion to make critical Jean’s length
equal to Lcrit.
- Order of magnitude then, write Jean’s length in terms of surface
density by equating free fall and crossing times: λJ = σ2/Gμ
= Lcrit, or σ=Gμ/Ω
- A more rigorous calculation gives σr=3.36Gμ/κ,
where κ is the epicyclic frequency (see below)
- Ratio of observed radial dispersion to critical dispersion is called Q,
and stability requires Q > 1.
- Near the Sun, Q is between 1 and 2.
|
14
|
- First-order Epicyclic theory (yes, epicycles!)
- Just an overview here for context
- Work with nearly circular orbits in a flattened axisymmetric
gravitational potential.
Write down the equations of motion in polar coordinates, using a
Taylor series.
- Basically just looking at the linear deviation from circular
orbits. You wind up with
equations that solve for the radial excursions and the precession of the
orbit in terms of “epicycles” of frequency κ.
|
15
|
- κ=2Ω is an ellipse, for instance.
|
16
|
- Thinking of rotation curves, the core shows fixed rotation (Ω =
constant, V=Ωr, and κ=2Ω)
- Differential rotation where V = constant (Ω=V0/r; then κ=√2Ω)
- Ratio of κ/Ω stays between 1 and 2 for realistic potentials.
|
17
|
- There are resonances of interest between stellar orbits (Ω(r)) and
spiral patterns (Ωp).
|
18
|
|
19
|
- What’s up with these spiral patterns anyway?
- Spiral flat rotation curves
- Differential rotation
- Implication for the persistence of a pattern
- Let’s work it out
|
20
|
- AKA “Self-sustaining Star Formation” = SSF or
“Contagious” star formation.
|
21
|
- AKA “Self-sustaining Star Formation” = SSF or
“Contagious” star formation.
|
22
|
- Epicyclic orbits are basically precessing ellipses.
|
23
|
- Linblad: rate of precession of orbits Ω – κ/2 almost
constant with r, so a 2-armed spiral wave would rotate without
deformation.
|
24
|
- Barred or spiral kinematic waves = density waves.
|
25
|
- Winding direction vs. sense of rotation.
|
26
|
|
27
|
- Flow of molecular clouds in a spiral potential, treated as a 1D
mechanical oscillator.
Clouds accumulate in the potential wells (spiral arms).
|
28
|
|
29
|
- Chapter 7 in Combes et al. on interacting galaxies.
- Start on Data Reduction and Analysis
- New problem set next week likely.
|