 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
� |
General
Relativity allows a repulsive term
|
|
|
|
� |
Einstein
proposed it to allow �steady state� universe
|
|
|
|
� |
He
decided it wasn�t needed after Hubble Law discovered
|
|
|
� |
Is the acceleration right?
|
|
|
|
� |
Could it be observational effect � dust dims
distant supernova?
|
|
|
|
� |
Could it be evolution effect � supernova were
fainter in the past?
|
|
|
|
� |
So far the results seem to stand up
|
|
|
� |
Still being determined:�
1)� density, 2) cosmological
constant
|
|
|
|
� |
With cosmological constant included, can have a �flat universe�
even
|
|
|
with acceleration.
|
|
|
|
� |
Given �repulsion� need to use relativistic �geometrical�
definition of
|
|
|
flatness, not the escape argument one given earlier.
|
|
|
|
� |
Energy (and equivalent mass) from cosmological
constant may provide
|
|
density needed to produce flat universe.
|
|