1
|
- Today: Extra Credit Articles
- Finish Chapter 7, the Sun
- Start Chatper 8
|
2
|
- If you keep adding protons to a nucleus?
- Coulomb repulsion continues to increase
- new proton feels repulsion from all other protons
- Strong force attraction reaches limit
- new proton can’t feel attraction from protons on far side of a
big nucleus
- Gain energy only up to point where Coulomb repulsion outweighs strong
force attraction.
- Most “stable” nucleus is 56Fe
(26 protons, 30 neutrons, 56 total)
- Release energy by fusion of
light nuclei to make heaver ones– up to 56Fe
- Release energy by fission of heavy nuclei to make lighter ones –
down to 56Fe
|
3
|
- Why can’t we keep adding neutrons rather than protons?
- They feel strong force attraction – with no Coulomb repulsion
- You should be able to get lots of energy by adding neutrons
- Nuclear Weak Force can (slowly) convert protons to neutrons and back
- The reactions involve an electron or “positron” to keep
charges balanced
- The reactions produce a new almost massless particle called a neutrino
- p+ + e- Û n + n p+ is proton
e- is electron
n is
neutron
n
is neutrino
- p+ Û n + e+ + n e+ is positron = antiparticle of
electron
If this second reaction happens then the positron
annihilates the next electron it encounters, thereby producing
the equivalent of the first reaction.
- The weak force likes to keep ~equal protons and neutrons in a nucleus
- The proton repulsion tips the balance towards slightly more neutrons in
big nuclei
|
4
|
- Gravity Dominates on astronomical scales
- Electromagnetic Holds atoms together: Chemistry
- Strong force Holds nuclei together: Nuclear energy
- Weak force n Ûp+, e- Radioactive decay
- (will also play critical role in solar fusion)
|
5
|
- Have lots of hydrogen (p+ and e-) – what can
we make from it?
- If 2He (2
protons, 0 neutrons) were stable, fusion would be “easy”
- Run two protons into each other at fast enough to overcome Coulomb
repulsion
- Once they get close enough strong force takes over, and holds them as
nucleus
|
6
|
- “Unfortunately” 2He isn’t stable
- To get stable He need to add one or two neutrons to:
- Increase Strong Force, without increasing Coulomb force
- Not really “unfortunate” – If 2He were
stable:
- Sun would burn energy way too fast – and would have gone out by
now
- Weak force converts proton to neutron–fusion will be slow
- In solar fusion no excess neutrons lying around
- Hydrogen bombs use deuterium: 2H = (p+ n) or
tritium: 3H = (p+
n n) to provide it
|
7
|
- The first step is slow because it relies on two rare events happening
simultaneously
- Two protons collide with enough energy to overcome the Coulomb barrier
- While they are close the weak force turns one proton into a neutron
- The resulting combination of a proton and a neutron IS a stable
nucleus
- 1H + 1H ® 2H + e+ + n p+ + p+ ® (p+
n) + e+ + n
- The next two steps go quickly because they
rely only on the strong force
- 2H + 1H ® 3H
(p+ n) + p+
® (p+ p+
n )
- 3H + 3H ® 4He + 1H + 1H
(p+ p+ n) + (p+ p+
n) ®
(p+ p+ n n) + p+ + p+
- The net effect is
4 1H ® 4He
|
8
|
- Could work it out “classically” by strength of forces
- Classical mechanics doesn’t work at this scale – Need
quantum mechanics
- Strength of nuclear forces not originally known
- Use E=mc2 to do accounting
- Mass is a measure of the energy stored in a system
- Loss of mass from a system means release of energy from that system
- Compare mass of four 1H to mass of one 4He
- 6.693 ´ 10-27
kg - 6.645 ´ 10-27 kg = 0.048 ´ 10-27 kg
drop in mass
- E = mc2 = 0.048 ´ 10-27 kg ´ (3 ´ 108 m/s)2 = 0.43 ´ 10-11 kg m2/s2
= 0.43 ´ 10-11 J
(note == a Joule is just shorthand for kg m2/s2)
- So 4.3 ´ 10-12
J of energy released
- This is huge compared to chemical energy: 2.2 ´10-18 J to ionize hydrogen
|
9
|
- Luminosity of sun: 3.8 ´ 1026
J/s
- H burned rate:
- H atoms available:
- Lifetime:
- In reality not all the atoms we start with are H, and only those near
the center are available for fusion. The structure of the sun will
change when about 10% of the above total have been used, so after about
10 billion years.
|
10
|
- Does lifetime of sun make sense?
- Oldest rocks on earth ~4 billion years old
- Oldest rocks in meteorites ~4.5 billion years old
- Other stars with higher/lower luminosity
- Causes for different luminosity
- Lifetimes of those stars
- Look for neutrinos from fusion
- Complicated story – due to neutrino properties
- Example of how astronomy presents “extreme” conditions
|
11
|
- Generated by “weak” force during p+® n + e+
+ n
- “Massless” particles which
interact poorly with matter
- In that first respect, similar to photons
- Can pass through sun without being absorbed
- Same property makes them very hard to detect
- Davis experiment at Homestake Mine in Black Hills
- 100,000 gallon tank of C2Cl4 dry cleaning fluid
- in Cl nuclei n + n ® p+ + e- so Cl (Z=17) becomes Ar (Z=18)
- Physically separate out the Ar, then wait for it to radioactively decay
- Saw only 1/3 the neutrinos predicted
|
12
|
- Lack of solar neutrinos confirmed by Kamiokande II detector in
Japan. (Using different
detection method)
- Possible explanation in terms of Neutrino physics
- 3 different types of Neutrinos:
- electron, muon, and tau neutrinos
- Sun generates and Cl detectors see only electron neutrinos
- Can electron neutrinos can change to another type on way here?
- These “neutrino oscillations” are possible if neutrino has
non-zero mass
- Kamiokande II evidence of muon neutrinos becoming electron ones
- Read “Window on Science 7-2” on “scientific faith”
- Neutrino mass may have implications for “cosmology”
- Neutrinos also used to study supernova 1987A
|
13
|
- Start on Chapter 8
- Homework #4 is up on WebCT, due Fri.
|