Astro 1050 Wed. Oct. 16, 2002
|
|
|
Today: Chapter 9: Formation
& Structure |
Spectral Measurements
|
|
|
|
Use spectra of stars |
|
Ignore broad (“high pressure” stellar
lines |
|
|
|
Very narrow (low pressure) lines from
interstellar gas |
|
This one Ca II = Ca+1 |
|
Stronger in more distant stars |
|
Stronger when looking through
interstellar gas clouds |
|
|
|
Hydrogen hard to measure |
|
remember Balmer rules |
|
|
Measurements at other
Wavelengths
|
|
|
|
Infrared “Cirrus” |
|
really slightly warm dust |
|
X-Rays of hot gas near exploded stars
(supernova) |
|
Radio observations of “Molecular
Clouds” |
|
Called that because cool and dense
enough for molecules to form |
|
H2 also hard to detect |
|
CO common and easy to detect |
|
Densest have 1000 atoms/cm3 |
|
T as low as 10 K |
|
Location of star formation |
|
|
Collapse of
Molecular Clouds
|
|
|
|
|
Barely stable against collapse: |
|
Imagine slightly compressing cloud |
|
Gravity goes up because material is
packed more tightly (R in 1/R2 is smaller) |
|
Tends to make cloud want to collapse |
|
|
|
Pressure goes up because material is
packed more tightly (P µ rT) and r higher |
|
Tends to make cloud want to expand |
|
|
|
For smaller clouds Pressure wins
(stable) |
|
For larger clouds Gravity wins
(collapse) |
|
As it collapses and becomes denser,
smaller and smaller parts become unstable |
|
Shock wave can trigger collapse |
What will a forming star
look like in HR diagram?
|
|
|
|
Temperature changes relatively simple |
|
Starts out large and relatively
cool Must be on red side of diagram |
|
It heats up as it contracts Must
towards the blue |
|
|
|
Luminosity more complicated because it
depends on T and R |
|
Not much energy to start
with Luminosity must start out low |
|
Collapse releases grav.
energy Luminosity will rise |
|
Fusion begins, releases more
energy Luminosity at a peak |
|
Collapse slows, only have fusion
now Luminosity declines |
|
|
|
Finally stabilizes on the main sequence |
How does mass affect
collapse?
|
|
|
|
|
More massive protostars have stronger
gravity |
|
Collapse speed will be much faster |
|
|
|
Fast collapse and short lifetime means
massive stars reach end of lifetime while low mass stars in cloud are just
forming |
|
Supernova shocks may come from earlier
generation of stars |
|
Sequential Star Formation |
|
|
|
Energy from supernova and other effects
eventually disrupts cloud – prevents further collapse. |
Observations of collapse
|
|
|
|
Young cluster “NGC 2264” |
|
Few million years old |
|
|
|
High mass stars have reached
main sequence |
|
Lower mass stars are still approaching
main sequence |
|
|
|
T Tauri stars |
|
|
|
Naming of classes of stars: Usually named after first star in
class: T Tauri |
|
Stars with letters (RR Lyrae) are
typically “variable” stars |
|
|
|
Earlier stages hidden by dust |
|
|
More details of stellar
structure and energy generation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternatives to the proton-proton chain |
|
|
|
Fusion of Helium to heavier elements |
|
|
|
Proton-proton reaction slow because: |
|
Need two rare events at once |
|
High energy collision of 2 protons |
|
Conversion of p Ţn during collision |
The CNO Cycle
|
|
|
Gives way around need for p ®n during the collision |
|
|
|
Still must happen later – but don’t
need to rare events simultaneously |
|
|
|
Trade off is need for higher energy
collisions (T>16 million K) |
|
|
|
Add p to some nucleus where new one is
still “stable” |
|
Wait for p ® n while that nucleus just “sits around” |
|
|
|
The net effect is still 4 1H
® 4He |
|
C just acts like a “catalyst” |
Heavy Element Fusion
|
|
|
|
Triple Alpha process |
|
4He + 4He ® 8Be + g |
|
8Be + 4He ® 12C + g |
|
|
|
Similar type reactions
create heavy elements above 600 Million K |
|
|
|
Plot to left gives: |
|
x:
# of neutrons |
|
y:
# of protons |
|
|
|
Right one – add neutron |
|
Up
one – add proton |
|
Diagonal – p ® n or reverse |
|
Jumps: add 4He or more |
Models of Stellar
Structure
|
|
|
|
Divide star into thin shells,calculate
how following vary from shell to shell
(i.e. as function of radius r) |
|
P (Pressure) |
|
T (Temperature) |
|
r (Density) |
|
To do this also need to find: |
|
M (Mass) contained within any r |
|
L (Luminosity) generated within any r |
|
|
|
P example: |
|
|
|
|
Numerical Stellar Models
Why don’t stars collapse?
|
|
|
|
Limiting case: Assume no nuclear fusion so only energy
source is gravity. |
|
|
|
Star is “almost” in hydrostatic
equilibrium |
|
Star radiates energy: If nothing else happened T would drop, P
would drop, star would shrink. |
|
Star does shrink, but in doing so
gravitational energy is converted to heat, preventing T from continuing to
drop. |
|
In fact, since star is now more
compact, gravity is stronger and it actually needs higher P (so higher T) to
prevent catastrophic collapse |
|
|
|
As star shrinks, ˝ of gravitational
energy goes into heating up star, ˝ gets radiated away |
|
|
|
Rate at which it radiates energy, so
rate at which it shrinks, is limited by how “insulating” intermediate layers
are |
Why do we get steady
fusion rates?
|
|
|
|
|
Strange counterintuitive result: |
|
As star radiates away thermal energy it
actually heats up
(because as it shrinks gravity supplies even more energy) |
|
|
|
Star continues to shrink till it gets
hot enough inside for fusion (rather than gravity) to balance energy being
radiated away. |
|
|
|
Nuclear thermostat |
|
If fusion reactions took place in a
“box” with fixed walls: |
|
Fusion Ţ more energy Ţhigher T Ţ more
fusion (explosion) |
|
|
|
If fusion reactions take place in sun
with “soft gravity walls”: |
|
If fusion rate is too high T tries to
go up but star expands and actually ends up cooling off – slowing down fusion. (steady rate) |
|
|
|
|
Mass-Luminosity
relationship
|
|
|
L µ M3.5 Why? |
|
|
|
Higher mass means higher internal
pressure |
|
Higher pressure goes with higher
temperature |
|
Higher temperature means heat leaks out
faster |
|
Star shrinks until T inside is high
enough for
fusion rate (which is very sensitive to temperature)
to balance heat leak rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lifetime on Main Sequence
|
|
|
L µ M3.5 T
µ
fuel / L = M/M3.5 = M-2.5 |
|
Example: M=2 MSun L = 11.3 LSun T =1/5.7 TSun |
|
|
|
|
How about a 0.5 solar
mass star?
|
|
|
M = 0.5 Msun |
|
Time = |
|
Luminosity = |
|
|
How about a 0.5 solar
mass star?
|
|
|
M = 0.5 Msun |
|
Time = 5.7 times solar lifetime |
|
Luminosity = 0.09 solar luminosity |
|
|
Width of Main Sequence –
and Stellar Aging
|
|
|
|
|
As star converts H to He you have more
massive nuclei |
|
Pressure related to number of nuclei |
|
Gravity related to mass of nuclei |
|
Pressure would tend to drop unless
something else happens |
|
Temperature must rise (slightly) to
compensate |
|
Luminosity must
rise (slightly) as heat leaks out faster |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orion Nebula: A
Star-Forming Region
|
|
|
Red light = Hydrogen emission |
|
Blue light = reflection nebula |
|
Dark lanes = dust |
|
|
|
Astronomy Picture of the Day:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod |
Protoplanetary Disks in
the Orion Nebula
|
|
|
|
|
Dusty disk seen in silhouette |
|
|
|
Central star visible at long
wavelengths |
Herbig-Haro objects: The
angular momentum problem
|
|
|
|
|
As clouds try to collapse angular
momentum makes them spin faster |
|
A disk forms around the protostar |
|
Material is ejected along the rotation
axis |
|
|
Herbig-Haro 34 in Orion
|
|
|
|
|
Jet along the axis visible as red |
|
|
|
Lobes at each end where jets run into
surrounding gas clouds |
Motion of Herbig-Haro 34
in Orion
|
|
|
|
|
Can actually see the knots in the jet
move with time |
|
|
|
In time jets, UV photons, supernova,
will disrupt the stellar nursery |